Might we want to regulate corporations in order to demand more honesty, more respect of human beings, and more environmental responsibility from them? There may be in every case other ways of predicting and explaining the behavior of an Intentional system — for instance, mechanistic or physical ways — but the Intentional stance may be the handiest or most effective or in any case a successful stance to adopt, which suffices for the object to be an intentional system.
Thus, corporations are undoubtedly morally and legally responsible for their contract breaches and tortuous behavior. The need for more entertainment, or better treatment for patients with a particular disease the founder of the company might have had.
Would such an intervention really be effective, or would it damage the ability of corporations to succeed in the market? When entrepreneurs create companies, they have values and specific purposes they want to tackle within society.
Laws and beliefs are influenced and based on society as a whole.
The obvious move, of course, is to say that the social and moral responsibilities of business are derived from the social and moral responsibilities of the people who own or run the business.
The second rebuttal speaker quoted French and used the aggregate theory, frequently touched by the proposition to support their claims for corporations, to describe a mob. In summary, then, we will certainly want to continue to have normative discussions about the role corporations can play in society.
Moreover, she went on to tie her teammates arguments together by using a soccer team analogy. The motion deals with real physical corporations and the morality of these corporations should be evaluated through a criterion that can analyze decisions that affect the real world.
The passage from Goodpaster and Matthews, Jr. This is valid, but repeated several times. I have now argued that business is not — and should not be seen as — a moral entity, bringing with it any specific moral obligations or exemptions ; and that corporations are not moral subjects, and hence cannot — and should not — be beholden to moral obligations.
Likewise, Rajan and Zingales And that distinct form, as it turns out, specifically foils the attempt to root business moral agency in the moral agency of the humans who own or operate a corporation.
The second speakers from both teams based their arguments of the same readings from Kant and Peter French. Under this instrumental length, the transitive property loses a lot of its validity.
If an organisation is not able or willing to make these changes, it should be possible to apply external pressure to it. The answers to these questions seem to require a more sophisticated understanding of group behavior and group action than the one currently driving policy related to the regulation and punishment of corporations.
The debate was composed of two teams, each of which had 4 members. The second negating rebuttal speech focused on tackling to the transitive property by trying to turn it against the affirmative team.Are corporations moral agents?
Do they have moral responsibilities? What do you think companies should do to make themselves more moral organizations?
I would have to say that corporations can be viewed as moral agents%(28). It is overwhelming how corporations have embedded a social responsibility in their mission statements and company objectives. This leaves us with one assertion that is that corporations do have some level of obligation towards society’s morality; however, the corporation itself is not a moral.
Dec 22, · Are Corporations Moral Agents? Published December 22, (Björnsson and Hess forthcoming) have even argued that corporations are full moral agents, capable of expressing emotions like guilt, and open to the same kinds of blaming. The discussion that follows is about corporations being moral agents or otherwise; however I will reach a conclusion that corporations do have an obligation that extends beyond obeying the law; evens so this obligation have been derived from the corporations quest for profit making.
Feb 04, · The Corporation: A Moral Agent? After reading the Business Ethics(Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy) article, I thought I would have a better understanding of a corporation from an ethical standpoint.
Do corporations, like people, have moral responsibility?
What, to put it more broadly, is the moral status of a corporation? Proponents of this view take corporations to be full moral agents, with rights as well as moral responsibilities.
The argument for this view is fairly straightforward. Philosopher Richard T. De George offers a concise.Download